You are here

Wireless HDMI System Hollyland Mars 300

Photo Moment - April 03, 2019

Wireless HDMI is a great technology with many uses. You can add a wireless camera to a live studio broadcast system, use it on a shoot for a director to monitor the shots from a distance (even if the camera is on a gimbal), or use it in a still photo shoot where you want a client to monitor the action but not be looking over your shoulder. 

If you’ve been thinking about adding a wireless HDMI system to your live broadcast studio or field shooting rig, but were put off by the high cost, then you'll want to check out the Hollyland Mars 300 Wireless HDMI System, a great bargain in the market at only $500. From the video above and the accompanying text below, first I explored the hardware, covering all the ports and buttons, discussing automatic pairing, mounting options, the dual HDMI outputs and how it all connects. In the second part, I tested the wireless performance by first taking you on a short tour of a studio setup, then I headed outdoors to see how it handled range and interference.

NOTE: Hollyland Tech supplied this unit to me free of charge for the purpose of this review. I have not been otherwise compensated for this review, and have no allegiance or bias towards or against the company or product.

Products Used

Hollyland Mars 300 System

Layout of the Hollyland Mars 300 HDMI Wireless System

The system consists of a transmitter and a receiver. The kit includes five antennas that unscrew off and fold away nicely (one is a backup in case you lose or break one). The antennas bend and rotate into any position.

Hollyland Mars 300 antenna array

When you first turn both the transmitter and receiver on, they automatically pair, which is great. But if you ever need to, you can easily re-pair them.

There’s also a channel cycle button for cycling through channels if you pick up any interference. Simply push one button on either the transmitter or the receiver; the signal will blank out, then quickly find and reconnect on a new channel. If you have a display connected, you'll see the status.

Hollyland Mars 300 Transmitter Layout


  1. HDMI IN — for the HDMI video signal coming from the camera
  2. HDMI LOOPUT — for connecting an external monitor
  3. 6–16V DCDC power input ideal for a studio environment, although at that point you're no longer wireless, so this won't be commonly used on the transmitter. In fact the kit only comes with a single AC power supply, so it's pretty much expected you'd only use that on the receiver.
  4. Sony NP Battery Mount — Both the transmitter and receiver use standard Sony NP batteries. There's no battery level indicator on the unit, so you may want to purchase NP batteries with a built-in battery level display. However, a commenter on YouTube said that another reviewer got over five hours of life on a small NP battery, so apparently these are quite low power!
  5. Antennas — two of them
  6. Cold shoe mount — this can be attached to the bottom or front of the unit, and there's also a ¼-20 mount on the bottom


  1. ON / OFFpower Switch
  2. PAIR — press on both units to enter a seek-and-pair mode
  3. UPGRADEUSB port for system upgrades
  4. CHANNELfor manually cycling through available channels
  5. VIDEO and LINK status lights — indicating if a link is in progress or established, and if video is detected or not. A complete guide to different light patterns is included in the manual.

Hollyland Mars 300 Receiver Layout

Hollyland Mars 300 Receiver Left side (HDMI OUT1 OUT2, DC POWER INPUT, NP BATTERY MOUNT)

  1. HDMI OUT1 & HDMI OUT2dual HDMI outputs, for connecting to monitors, recorders, or whatever you like
  2. 6–16V DCDC power input
  3. Sony NP Battery Mount


  1. ON / OFFpower switch
  2. PAIR — press on both units to enter a seek-and-pair mode
  3. UPGRADEUSB port for system upgrades
  4. CHANNEL / OSDfor manually cycling through available channels, and for enabling the On Screen Display, which displays unit status and information about the signal its receiving, including dropped frames, on the connected HDMI monitor
  5. VIDEO and LINK status lights — indicating if a link is in progress or established, and if video is detected or not

Connecting the Hollyland Mars 300 System

Connecting is very straightforward; all you're doing is taking the HDMI out from your camera, and connecting it to the transmitter. Depending on your camera, you may have control over the HDMI output signal, such as automatic or manual downscaling. If you're not seeing an image coming through right away, I'd recommend checking out your HDMI output settings on the camera. 

If you watch the video above, you'll see that I put together a pretty ridiculous franken-rig to hold the GH5 and 12mm lens, a Feelworld monitor and the Mars 300 on one cage. It's ugly and off-balance, but I put it together quickly for the show. Without a doubt you'd want to be a little more careful with your rigging! The Mars 300 isn't heavy at all though, and with reports that even the smallest NP batteries last for hours, you can keep it light weight, too.

Another thing I discovered is that the HDMI pass through on the Transmitter does introduce a delay even to the connected monitor; it's about half of the delay to the receiver (more on that below). But it does mean that if you're holding the camera and transmitter on a rig and using the monitor to, well, monitor, then you'll be seeing things on about a ¼ second delay. If you wanted to avoid that, you could route the signal from the camera into the monitor first, and then pass it through to the Mars 300 (assuming your monitor has a pass-through, of course).

Delay in the Hollyland Mars 300

An important point of using this in a live production environment is the delay. Very high-end wireless HDMI systems have virtually zero delay (although I can't attest to if the ones that say zero delay are actually zero delay… ), the Mars 300 is most definitely not zero delay. It is however only about half a second, which in my opinion is pretty great for a system of this cost.

What this means on a practical sense though is that if you're using it in a live production environment, you have to be very aware of your audio and video sync. In live production, your audio is likely to be handled separately, going through a mixer and merging with other video sources. The audio will be realtime, and the video may or may not be realtime, depending on the hardware. For example on my own live studio, I use BlackMagic Studio cameras for the live show which have SDI connections and are truly realtime into the mixer. I also use a few older GH4 cameras (the close-up and top-down cameras) which are HDMI-out and are not realtime. To my knowledge, no HDMI system is ever realtime from the camera. As I understand it, there is processing involved in the HDMI stack that takes time. It's minimal; in my system it's about 3 or 4 frames on a 24p broadcast, so only ⅙ to ⅛ of a second, but that's enough of a delay where the audio and video aren't in sync if you're pointing the camera at a talking head (which is why in my studio, the real-time Blackmagic cameras are the ones that point at me, while the GH4 cameras are the ones reserved for close-ups where you don't see my mouth).

In the case of the Mars 300, with a roughly half-second delay, this is extremely noticeable and has to be solved. This can be addressed in one of two ways; either the audio can be delayed in the mixer so it matches the delayed video, or the audio can be routed through the camera connected to the Mars 300, so the audio and video begin in sync, and are delayed together at the source. 

Or, just don't point the camera at a talking head ;-) 

Performance and Range of the Hollyland Mars 300

I never did a line-of-site range test, although the company claims 300 feet. I did something much harder, and took the rig outside of my steel and concrete warehouse studio, with the metal door closed. I got about 100 feet away before the link light started to flash, and the audio started to drop. Interestingly the video was perfectly fine throughout that, so the link light flashing is a good indicator that you're near the end of the video range, and while you may be losing audio the video should still be fine. If your audio is being handled separately or isn't being used, then that shouldn't be a problem. 

The video quality held beautifully throughout the range test. Watch the video below to see it, as it was recorded live!


Overall, the Hollyland Mars 300 Wireless HDMI System has great automatic pairing, flexible antennas, a good set of easy to understand buttons, an acceptable image delay, and the least expensive price in the market.

Live Range Test


Today's Q&A and Unedited Live Show

See what you missed in the full, unedited LIVE show (this starts with the Q&A; back up if you want to see the whole live show)


Other Videos Mentioned in This Video

Full Video Transcript

This transcript has been automatically generated so it’s not 100% accurate. But, if you're looking for a particular portion of the show, this is a pretty a good way to find it!

Leave a comment on YouTube

Comments from YouTube

Hollyland Tech reached out to me to ask if I'd review their wireless HDMI kit, the Mars 300 (that's for 300 feet range). At $500 it's a relative bargain, so I said yes!
Part 2 of this video (the actual live test) is at
Get your Hollyland Mars 300 here:
Do you need a capture card?
For what?
Thank you for the video! We're looking at live streaming weddings so this would be super handy. Just a quick question... If we were to set up camera's with wireless lav mics to record sound from the groom, would we be able to use the Mars 300? Or would there be interference as there was in this video?
Interference would not be between the wireless mic and the wireless HDMI. I don't recall exactly what interference was in this video other than simply going out of range. But you can definitely put a wireless lav on the groom, put the receiver on the camera, and then transmit from the camera to your live streaming switcher to keep video and audio in sync.
@PhotoJoseph Perfect thank you so so much!
how many monitors can you connect to this system?
awesome, thank you for the review !
Mines wont work with my GH4
I have the same problem. GH4 screen is going black ant thats it. Is there any solution?
HI THERE, On Mars 300 it says that it can only transmit 1080p, Does it work seamlessly with yours? Or on the receiver you only see 1080p picture and no a 4k? I'm planning on getting it for my pocket 4k for pulling focus. Thank you
I’m confused at the question… it does 1080p, as you’ve said. Not 4K. Most cameras (like the GH5) will allow you to output 1080p while recording 4K, so yes it will work for pulling focus. You have to be aware of the slight latency though and plan for it, meaning you stop pulling focus slightly before you hit your mark. It’ll take some getting used to. More expensive models are closer to real-time.
Sure be nice if DJI would make something with there technology. I get 4 km of HD transmission to my receiver. Im sure DJI could design something for pennies compared to any of these.
$300 is pennies, compared to what this used to cost!
@PhotoJoseph Absolutely. I just want better reception.
This is Supported in ATEM Telivision studio ?
Yeah, it’s just an HDMI source. But, and I don’t recall if I talked about this in this video, but you may need to reboot the ATEM with the Hollyland attached for it to work. I don’t know why.
Hey Joseph, thanks for the review! I understand if you send 29.97 fps into the transmitter, the receiver will round up the frames and output 30 fps. What switcher are you using, and do you have to convert the frame rate for your switcher to recognize it when your switcher is set to 29.97? I have the $1,000 rackmount ATEM. Thanks in advance!
Hmm, did I say in this video that 29.97 rounds up to 30? I don’t recall, it was a while ago. My ATEM is set to 24.00 so that’s why I shoot at. If however it is rounding up to 30 and your ATEM is set to 29.97 then yes you’ll probably need to convert. However I’ve noticed that the HDMI port is somewhat forgiving. SDI is not. If you have a spare HDMI port, try that first.
@PhotoJoseph I think you said it rounds up, and then I confirmed that with Hollyland's tech support. Thank you!
Waste of money. It don't work behind the wall.
I just picked one of these kits up and paid $350 on Amazon! What a freaking bargain. Took me a second to figure out why the output on my monitor was all green but then I set the GH5's HDMI output downconvert to "AUTO" and it played back the transmission flawlessly. One thing I hate is those damn NP batteries! I'm gonna try to find a DC>DTAP cable so I can at the very least power the transmitter via my Movi Pro.
I've been waiting for a sub $1,000 Transmitter like this for years. The consumer $200 versions work well for stationary cameras but is terrible for moving cameras at even half spec range. I'd still rent the high-end stuff because of their range, signal quality and virtually zero latency.
Nice! It’d be interesting to hear your comparison of these to the high end ones you’re used to renting, since I’ve never used those.
From another video on this Mars 300, the reviewer used one of the small NP batteries on both transmitter and receiver and he got about 5 hours of use. So using that large battery would last at LEAST all day, so no battery capacity LEDs are necessary. Don't worry... it's low power.
Wow! That’s fantastic.
how to switch between the channel & how many channel can be select?
Just push the channel button and it jumps to the next one. I think there were five available channels? I don't recall but I'm sure you can download the manual from their website.
The Crystal-800 came-tv is nice.
This device also has Wi-Fi at the receiver, everyone can enjoy on their I-Pad,s.
On the app is also the remaining power to read.
For less money.
The same akku.
800 metres far.
Less lag.
The transmitter has HDMI micro I find nothing unfortunately silly choice of manufacturer.
I thought the main benefit of the broadcast grade wireless HDMI transmitters like this was that the delay is down to a couple frames. I have a $190 transmitter/receiver pair that I use for wirelessly sending slides from a presenters computer to a projector and my streaming rig. It would work just as well with a camera too. It definitely adds a delay which is why I can’t use it alongside wired cameras, tho the delay ends up not mattering when it’s just the slides. What do you think the target market here is, if this device adds that much of a delay, but you can easily find even cheaper options?
Interesting question. I looked at a few of the expensive units and yes they do say “zero delay”. I find that very hard to believe but let’s assume their marketing is correct.

I neglected to say that the HDMI connection already has a four frame delay, so I counted 12 frames from the wireless camera which means only eight frames are from the Mars. Still not real-time though.

What’s the $190 unit you have? What is the range, and the delay, and does it carry audio too?
HDMI cable usualy gives around 80ms of delay this thing gives you 100ms if I remember correctly.
I'd say anything over 300ms of delay becomes useless for focus pulling.
I am here to get an insight on it😀
@PhotoJoseph Any time! 👍🏻
@PhotoJoseph the Ronin-s right? Mauro has all of them 😬
Honestly I don’t even remember what mine is… not a Ronin though
@PhotoJoseph then you most definitely should dust it off and use it! Like the intro shots btw. Who did those?
I did! All handheld.
You COULD even use in the reverse as a way to monitor your program OUT from the ATEM when you're walking about!
Hmmm… I like it! Of course I’d need two kits… if I’m far enough away to need to monitor wirelessly I’ll be broadcasting wirelessly too. I do have a monitor on wheels for in-studio or even just outside the door monitoring. Same cable length as the rolling camera, basically.
You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address.
Passwords are case-sensitive - Forgot your password?